A framework to identify destination vulnerability to hazards / Sergio Alvarez, Frida Bahja, and Alan Fyall.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: United Kingdom : Elsevier Ltd., c2021.Description: 14 pages ; figuresISSN:
  • 0261-5177
Subject(s): Online resources: In: Tourism Management Volume 90 (June 2022)Summary: We posit that destination vulnerability is the result of chronic conditions whose root causes lie dormant in plain sight, yet rear their ugly head during every crisis. This interdisciplinary review is motivated by the central research question: why do some destinations suffer more acute impacts in the same or similar crises than other destinations? While the paper falls short of providing a satisfactory answer, it reviews concepts such as resilience and vulnerability, the difference between shocks and stressors, and the types of hazards, and proposes a conceptual framework that highlights the physical, social-cultural, economic, ecological/environmental, and institutional dimensions of vulnerability. We also review the main findings in the literature on the experience of destinations during and after hazards, and illustrate the dimensions of destination vulnerability through evidence uncovered by prior studies. The paper affords Destination Management Organizations the language and conceptual understanding to identify vulnerability in their own destinations.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Continuing Resources Continuing Resources NU Clark Journals Periodicals Available

Includes bibliographical references (pages 10-14).

We posit that destination vulnerability is the result of chronic conditions whose root causes lie dormant in plain sight, yet rear their ugly head during every crisis. This interdisciplinary review is motivated by the central research question: why do some destinations suffer more acute impacts in the same or similar crises than other destinations? While the paper falls short of providing a satisfactory answer, it reviews concepts such as resilience and vulnerability, the difference between shocks and stressors, and the types of hazards, and proposes a conceptual framework that highlights the physical, social-cultural, economic, ecological/environmental, and institutional dimensions of vulnerability. We also review the main findings in the literature on the experience of destinations during and after hazards, and illustrate the dimensions of destination vulnerability through evidence uncovered by prior studies. The paper affords Destination Management Organizations the language and conceptual understanding to identify vulnerability in their own destinations.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 NU LRC CLARK. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy I Powered by: KOHA